Differences in the Effectiveness of the Antibacterial Power of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Povidone Iodine 10% against the Growth of Porphyromonas Gingivalis Bacteria

Authors

  • Dwi Leni Yuliana Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Wiyata

Keywords:

Chlorhexidine, Povidone Iodine, G ingivitis, Periodontitis, Porphyromonas Gingivalis

Abstract

One of the causes of gingivitis and periodontitis is the bacteria Porphyromonas gingivalis. In liquid form, chlorhexidine and povidone iodine are antibacterial and can stop the growth of P. gingivalis bacteria. The goal of this study was to find out how chlorhexidine and povidone iodine liquids were different in their ability to stop the growth of P. gingivalis bacteria. In a lab experiment with a population of P. gingivalis bacteria, a post-test-only group design was used. Seven samples were chosen at random for each treatment, and the samples were split into three groups. The normality test uses the Shapiro-Wilk test, and statistical tests use the independent sample t-test. The results of the independent sample t-test show a p value < 0.05, which indicates that overall there is a significant difference in the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine solution and povidone iodine solution against the growth of P. gingivalis bacteria, so it can be concluded that administering the povidone iodine solution is more effective than the chlorhexidine solution as an antibacterial against the growth of P. gingivalis bacteria.

References

Armiati, IGK, (2019). Polishing Composite Fillers Can Reduce the Number of Color Changes (Discoloration) in Nanofiller Composite Resin Caused by the Use of Chlorhexidine Mouthwash. Department of Dental Conservation, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar

Astria, N., Ari, S., Latief, M., (2017). Killing power and antimicrobial inhibitory power of chlorhexidine 2% and povidone iodine 1% as root canal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis. Conservative Dentistry Journal. 7(1), 12-17

Caranzza, F.A., Klokkeyold, P.R., Newman, MG, Takei, HH, (2019). Clinical Periodontology, 13th. Philadhelpia, PA: Elsevier

Eolia, C., Armia, S., (2019). Antibacterial Effectiveness of Ethanol Extract of Fig Leaves (Ficus carica Linn) Against Porphyromonas gingivalis Bacteria in Vitro. Padjadjaran University Dental Medicine Journal. 31(3), 171-177.

Fauzia, NS, Henri, H., Jeffrey, (2021). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Povidone Iodine Mouthwash with Chlorhexidine on Plaque Index. Oceana Biomedicina Journal, 4(1).

Gerits E, Natalie V, Jan M., (2017). New Approaches to Combat Porphyromonas gingivalis Biofilms. Journal of Oral Microbiology. 9(4).

Langgartner, J. (2012). Combine Skin Disinfection with Chlorexidine and Aqueous Povidone Iodine Reduces Bacterial Colonization of Central Venous Catheter. Intensive Care Med, 30, 1081-8

Rizkiyah, M., Beta, WO, Ika, KW, (2021). Prevalence and Analysis of Risk Factors for Gingivitis and Periodontitis in Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Dentin (Jur. of Dentistry), 5(1), 33 – 36.

Teixeira, DDS, Maria, AZDF, Karen, C., Silvia DDO, Fernanda, GS, (2019). The Topical Effect of Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine in the Repair of Oral Wounds. A review. Stomatologija. Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 21, 35-41.

Sinaredi, BR, Seno, P., & Teguh, BW (2014). Antibacterial Power of Chlorhexidine Mouthwash, Povidone Iodine, Zinc Fluoride Supplement Against, Streptococcus mutans and Porphyromonas gingivalis . Unair FKG Journal , 47(4).

Supriyatin, S., Oktafirani, AS, (2023). Inhibitory Power of Mouthwash Containing Povidone Iodine and Methyl Salicylate Against the Growth of Staphylococcus Aureus. Indonesian Multidisciplinary Journal , 2(1).

Downloads

Published

20-09-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Differences in the Effectiveness of the Antibacterial Power of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Povidone Iodine 10% against the Growth of Porphyromonas Gingivalis Bacteria (Dwi Leni Yuliana, Trans.). (2023). Cigarskruie: Journal of Educational and Islamic Research, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.65190/gbcsct20